[Filters] Add filters to DAG View – Runs tab

[cmarteepants]

View

DAG View – Runs tab

Filters to Add

• Filter by Run After Range
  ↪ Helps find runs that were delayed or executed later than expected

• Filter by Start Date
  ↪ Helps find runs that started during a specific window of time (e.g. following a system update)

• Filter by End Date
  ↪ Useful to identify runs that ended recently or ended during a problematic period

• Filter by Duration Range
  ↪ Identify long-running or stuck DAGs

• Filter by DAG Version and/or Bundle Version
  ↪ Correlate failures or anomalies with recent code or deployment changes

• Filter by Conf Key/Value
  ↪ Enables users to track down runs with specific parameters (e.g., a run triggered with a certain partner_id)

• Filter by Logical Date Range
  ↪ Useful for identifying runs within a specific scheduled interval (e.g., a regression starting on June 1)

• Filter by Triggered By (e.g. manual, CLI, sensor, asset, backfill)
  ↪ Quickly isolate runs from specific sources or trigger types

• Filter by Consuming Asset
  ↪ Identify DAG runs triggered by a specific upstream asset event

• Filter by Producing Asset
  ↪ Identify DAG runs producing a specific downstream asset event

API Support

⚠️ Partial

• /dagRuns supports filtering by:

  • dag_id
  • state
  • run_type
  • execution_date (logical date)

• Missing filter support for:

  • Conf content (e.g., key/value search)
  • Run-after range
  • Logical date range
  • DAG version or bundle version
  • Trigger source (manual, CLI, etc.)
  • Producing asset / Consuming asset

UI Impact

• Filters could be placed above the DAG Run table (as dropdowns, date pickers, or input fields)
• Filtering improves usability in high-throughput environments and large DAGs
• Enables faster root cause analysis and run correlation

Notes

• Conf filtering and trigger source filtering are especially useful for asset-aware and parameterized DAGs
• Logical date and duration range are essential for tracking SLAs and performance regressions

[valentinDruzhinin]

@potiuk can I take this issue?

[potiuk]

Yes. But You do not need to tag me. Just comment that you want to take the issue next time without tagging people :)

[valentinDruzhinin]

@potiuk sorry :) I thought it would be better to be assigned to the issue to prevent 2 people from doing the same.

[vatsrahul1001]

@valentinDruzhinin, how are we progressing on this?

[valentinDruzhinin]

Hey @vatsrahul1001 . I've done around 50% of the work already. Maybe need 1 more week to create the PR :)

[phanikumv]

Thanks for the update @valentinDruzhinin , appreciate it !