Skip to content

MNTR: make spec filtering more flexible #4907

@Aaronontheweb

Description

@Aaronontheweb

Version: 1.4.18

The spec filtering we have for the MNTR today is not very well documented and is extremely brittle - i.e. I have to get the FQN of the method marked with MultiNodeFact spelled exactly right on the CLI. https://getakka.net/articles/testing/multi-node-testing.html#running-multi-node-tests

I would strongly prefer it if the spec argument scheme followed what NBench does, which allows wildcard include / exclude filtering rules for this purpose: https://nbench.io/articles/running.html#commandline-arguments

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions