Bump botocore dependency specification

[jakob-keller]

Description of Change

This PR intends to improve general compatibility of aiobotocore within the Python ecosystem by bumping the dependency specification of botocore, as well as boto3 and awscli.

Assumptions

Upstream contains changes that require adjustments to the aiobotocore codebase.

Checklist for All Submissions

• I have added change info to CHANGES.rst
• If this is resolving an issue (needed so future developers can determine if change is still necessary and under what conditions) (can be provided via link to issue with these details):
  • Detailed description of issue
  • Alternative methods considered (if any)
  • How issue is being resolved
  • How issue can be reproduced
• If this is providing a new feature (can be provided via link to issue with these details):
  • Detailed description of new feature
  • Why needed
  • Alternatives methods considered (if any)

Checklist when updating botocore and/or aiohttp versions

• I have read and followed CONTRIBUTING.rst
• I have updated test_patches.py where/if appropriate (also check if no changes necessary)
• I have ensured that the awscli/boto3 versions match the updated botocore version
• I have added URL to diff: https://github.com/boto/botocore/compare/1.37.1..1.37.3

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 34.48276% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.63%. Comparing base (d2d8f2b) to head (0ca6c4a).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
aiobotocore/parsers.py	32.14%	19 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1348      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.88%   90.63%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          67       67              
  Lines        6569     6597      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits         5970     5979       +9     
- Misses        599      618      +19     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	90.63% <34.48%> (-0.25%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jakob-keller]

@thehesiod: Thanks for the review.

Auto-merge is unavailable due to the low patch coverage. I checked the unit tests ported by @stj in #1323 and believe that even with those, patch coverage would be imperfect. This is probably due to a lack of test coverage in upstream.

May I suggest we merge this PR now and cut a release?

[stj]

Thanks @jakob-keller! Am happy to close my PR and skip on all the tests that I pulled from upstream.
Once this is merged, I'll take a look at updating to 1.37.5 with the User agent 2.1 enhancement.
+1 on a release with the changes to support CBOR.

[jakob-keller]

Once this is merged, I'll take a look at updating to 1.37.5 with the User agent 2.1 enhancement.

I'm afraid, botocore 1.37.4 will be a challenge due to the introduction of client contexts.

[thehesiod]

Once this is merged, I'll take a look at updating to 1.37.5 with the User agent 2.1 enhancement.

I'm afraid, botocore 1.37.4 will be a challenge due to the introduction of client contexts.

shouldn't be too bad, contextvars should "just work" in asyncio as in asyncio they're tied to the task...caveat though in that you need to make sure you create the context while in an async method.

[jakob-keller]

@thehesiod: Thanks, I'll cut a release, if you don't mind.