Skip to content

Conversation

AndresOrtegaGuerrero
Copy link
Member

Added functionality to the structure widget to synchronize the atom table with the selection in the widget.
The widget now supports bidirectional selection behavior: selecting rows in the table updates the widget's selection, and selecting items in the widget updates the table's selection.

Screen.Recording.2025-01-07.at.16.59.28.mov

Copy link
Member

@edan-bainglass edan-bainglass left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AndresOrtegaGuerrero AndresOrtegaGuerrero merged commit 72911d9 into main Jan 7, 2025
11 checks passed
@AndresOrtegaGuerrero AndresOrtegaGuerrero deleted the new_effect_table branch January 7, 2025 16:17
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.87%. Comparing base (f9d5930) to head (7167a68).
Report is 150 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...pp/result/components/viewer/structure/structure.py 25.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1061      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.90%   67.87%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         112      112              
  Lines        6664     6668       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         4525     4526       +1     
- Misses       2139     2142       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
python-3.11 67.87% <25.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
python-3.9 67.89% <25.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants