Optimize set! DSL (Round 2) #16
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up to #15, which made some changes to how blocks were passed around. Did some due diligence and actually found that doing it in
_setdidn't help. I put the results of some IPS benchmarks below... while they all show "difference falls within error", this new revision does run a bit faster. I had some previous runs showing that this new revision is faster without the error margin, but can't consistently reproduce that. Only included IPS because no differences showed up in memory allocation.I think it's best to go with this new revision for a few reasons:
::Kernel.block_given?show up as hotspots in our Datadog profiles, so maybe best to save on that if we can.Oddly enough, having
&blockinJbuilderTemplate#set!is consistently slower. I have no idea why it matters in one case but not the other.