Migrate to unoserver #1051
Open
Migrate to unoserver #1051
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
winged
force-pushed
the
migrate_to_unoserver
branch
13 times, most recently
from
bbec95a to
7cee431
Compare
The old `unoconv` is not supported anymore upstream and needs to be replaced. Instead of running all the subprocess management code ourselves, we now just let this happen in it's own container. This should improve service stability significantly, as it's now cleanly separated. While we're at it, also update the base image to newest debian Trixie
winged
force-pushed
the
migrate_to_unoserver
branch
from
7cee431 to
86547b4
Compare
|
That's an interesting change without having an RFC for it 😅 How does this solution compare to #969? |
|
You're righ, that would probably be a better solution. We'd need to analyze it in a bit more depth though |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The old
unoconvis not supported anymore upstream and needs to be replaced.Instead of running all the process management code ourselves, we now just let
this happen in it's own container.