Add Redirect options as columns to the Bundles tab

[AllieRays]

Description
There are content types that never should be displayed with its own page, like an image media entity that's displayed in a carousel. Rabbit Hole can prevent this node from being accessible on its own page with the following options

• Deliver an access denied page.
• Deliver a page not found page.
• Issue a page redirect to any path or external url.
• Or simply display the entity (regular behavior).

I think this should be a standard and specified in the Drupal Spec tool. I made a copy of the Drupal spec tool excel book with the updates I think should be added.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1muqPOBLFwr_PySl5OIbcWhrObGzs0yCamrJEGm_pBV8/edit?usp=sharing

Implementation

Columns that would need to be added to the Bundles tab.

Column	Redirect Behavior	Redirect Override	Redirect Path
note	Redirect Module is Enabled	Redirect Module is Enabled. If page redirect is selected, then allow these settings to be overridden for individual entities. If this is checked, users with the Administer Rabbit Hole settings for Content type permission will be able to override these settings for individual entities.	Rabbit Hole is enabled. This is the path where nodes should be redirected. A good default would be /front.
data validation	Page Redirect, Page not found, Display the page, Access denied	y, n	n/a

[AllieRays]

As discussed, I made an issue with the lightning core module to add Rabbit hole into the lighting distro.
https://www.drupal.org/project/lightning_core/issues/3112048

[TravisCarden]

Thanks, @AllieRays. As I said when we discussed it, I support this, and I'll accept it if any of the following criteria are met:

• The module is included in Lightning or Drupal core
• PS makes it an official best practices recommendation
• A significant proportion of the Drupal community adopts the solution

(I should document that standard somewhere.)

Please let me know if you determine that any of those conditions attain. I'll bring your Lightning issue to the attention of the team.

[TravisCarden]

I brought it up to the Lightning team, @AllieRays, and they said they'd rather see this functionality go into Drupal core. Here's a d.o issue I created a couple of years ago which has a lot of overlap with which got a flash of attention at the time: Make the features of content, taxonomy, and blocks available à la carte [#2939529]. I would encourage you to file another issue to include Rabbit hole functionality in core and cross-link those issues. In the meantime, I would love to see PS adopt this as a best practice. If you'd like to start a conversation (with the tech leads?) I would be happy to weight in.