Skip to content

Conversation

@tlively
Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively commented Jul 18, 2024

This abbreviates a common pattern where we first had to check whether a
heap type was basic, then if it was, get its unshared version and
compare it to some expected BasicHeapType.

Suggested in
#6771 (comment).

@tlively tlively requested a review from kripken July 18, 2024 18:56
@tlively tlively force-pushed the threads-shared-fuzzing branch from 35c227f to a6c1419 Compare July 18, 2024 20:39
@tlively tlively force-pushed the threads-maybe-shared-util branch from ebe11c4 to 4cf7f52 Compare July 18, 2024 20:40
@tlively tlively force-pushed the threads-shared-fuzzing branch from a6c1419 to ec3bc3e Compare July 18, 2024 20:41
@tlively tlively force-pushed the threads-maybe-shared-util branch from 4cf7f52 to ee5fd0d Compare July 18, 2024 20:41
Base automatically changed from threads-shared-fuzzing to main July 18, 2024 20:41
tlively and others added 2 commits July 18, 2024 13:42
This abbreviates a common pattern where we first had to check whether a
heap type was basic, then if it was, get its unshared version and
compare it to some expected BasicHeapType.

Suggested in
#6771 (comment).
Co-authored-by: Alon Zakai <[email protected]>
@tlively tlively force-pushed the threads-maybe-shared-util branch from ee5fd0d to 531d6a7 Compare July 18, 2024 20:42
@tlively tlively merged commit 84daeca into main Jul 18, 2024
@tlively tlively deleted the threads-maybe-shared-util branch July 18, 2024 20:43
@gkdn gkdn mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants