Skip to content

Conversation

@tlively
Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively commented Jun 18, 2024

The unused bits must be a sign extension of the significant value, but we were
previously only validating that unsigned LEBs had their unused bytes set to
zero. Re-enable the spec test that checks for proper validation.

@tlively tlively requested a review from kripken June 18, 2024 22:47
: ((mask_type(1) << (sizeof(T) * 8 - shift)) - 1u);
T significant_payload = payload_mask & payload;
value |= significant_payload << shift;
T unused_bits_mask = ~payload_mask & 0x7F;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have 127 and 128 above, so perhaps replace 0x7F with that, or replace the above with hex?

@tlively tlively force-pushed the spec-test-globals branch from c8968e0 to 53f3d0f Compare June 19, 2024 00:23
@tlively tlively force-pushed the spec-test-leb128 branch from 782d30a to c4bd0b4 Compare June 19, 2024 00:24
Base automatically changed from spec-test-globals to main June 19, 2024 01:35
tlively added 2 commits June 18, 2024 18:36
The unused bits must be a sign extension of the significant value, but we were
previously only validating that unsigned LEBs had their unused bytes set to
zero. Re-enable the spec test that checks for proper validation.
@tlively tlively force-pushed the spec-test-leb128 branch from c4bd0b4 to 5c8bd00 Compare June 19, 2024 01:36
@tlively tlively enabled auto-merge (squash) June 19, 2024 01:36
@tlively tlively merged commit 3acacac into main Jun 19, 2024
@tlively tlively deleted the spec-test-leb128 branch June 19, 2024 02:12
@gkdn gkdn mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants