Skip to content

Conversation

@kripken
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken commented Jul 26, 2021

If there is a tail call, we can't change the return type of the function, as it
must match in the functions doing a tail call of it.

@kripken kripken requested review from aheejin and tlively July 26, 2021 23:36
@tlively
Copy link
Member

tlively commented Jul 28, 2021

I think this should be reverted after #4032. Sorry I didn't think about this sooner! Happy to chat more about this tomorrow, too.

@kripken
Copy link
Member Author

kripken commented Jul 28, 2021

No worries, sounds good. After that lands I'll revert the code and update the tests here. And I'll convert the other PR to just a test.

kripken added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2021
Partially reverts #4025, removing the code and updates the test to show
we do the optimization.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants