Skip to content

Conversation

ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

We should probably move / remove those wrapped functions too, but another time.

@@ -73,7 +75,7 @@ UDerivativeWrapper(f::F, t, p) where {F} = UDerivativeWrapper{isinplace(f, 4)}(f
(ff::UDerivativeWrapper{true})(du1, u) = ff.f(du1, u, ff.p, ff.t)
(ff::UDerivativeWrapper{true})(u) = (du1 = similar(u); ff.f(du1, u, ff.p, ff.t); du1)

mutable struct ParamJacobianWrapper{iip, fType, tType, uType} <: AbstractSciMLFunction{iip}
mutable struct ParamJacobianWrapper{iip, fType, tType, uType} <: AbstractWrappedFunction{iip}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[JuliaFormatter] reported by reviewdog 🐶

Suggested change
mutable struct ParamJacobianWrapper{iip, fType, tType, uType} <: AbstractWrappedFunction{iip}
mutable struct ParamJacobianWrapper{iip, fType, tType, uType} <:
AbstractWrappedFunction{iip}

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 5ea73ad into master Aug 13, 2025
38 of 64 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the functionspecialization branch August 13, 2025 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants