Skip to content

Conversation

@travisgosselin
Copy link
Member

Clarified requirements for header values in requests and responses for execution context. The original intent was that there may be scenarios where the response value provides a different alias, or redirected version that is available. This was worded carefully in the statement before and after in the original content. Adding this line in the last update overrides that intent.

…atch

Clarified requirements for header values in requests and responses for execution context. The original intent was that there may be scenarios where the response value provides a different alias, or redirected version that is available. This was worded carefully in the statement before and after in the original content. Adding this line in the last update overrides that intent.

Signed-off-by: Travis Gosselin <[email protected]>
@travisgosselin travisgosselin self-assigned this Oct 28, 2025
@travisgosselin travisgosselin requested a review from a team as a code owner October 28, 2025 18:18
Copy link

@acchristensen acchristensen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me. just as a heads up, I think we might come back to this to help provide some clarity around the statement. It's a bit long. But I'm honestly not sure how I would do that, right now, that wouldn't be more confusing.

@travisgosselin travisgosselin merged commit 55b2b09 into main Oct 29, 2025
5 checks passed
@travisgosselin travisgosselin deleted the ec-reconsider-original-response branch October 29, 2025 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants