Skip to content

refactor: autofix issues in 2 files #15

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deepsource-autofix[bot]
Copy link

Using hardcoded temp directory is unsafe. The program can be tricked into performing file actions against the wrong file or using a malicious file instead of the expected temporary file. Prefer using tempfile

Using hardcoded temp directory is unsafe. The program can be tricked into performing file actions against the wrong file or using a malicious file instead of the expected temporary file. Prefer using [tempfile](https://docs.python.org/3/library/tempfile.html)
Copy link

deepsource-dev bot commented May 7, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 1e63b69..952ec77. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Python LogoPython❌ Failure
❗ 14 occurences introduced
🎯 7 occurences resolved
View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented May 7, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 1e63b69..952ec77. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Python LogoPython❌ FailureView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

…age, and f-strings

**Fixes are generated by AI. Review them carefully before applying to your codebase.**

This pull request implements several improvements based on DeepSource analysis. The changes focus on enhancing code readability, conciseness, and idiomatic Python usage.

Key changes include:
- **`with` statements can be merged:** Consecutive `with` statements for managing resources can often be merged to improve readability and reduce nesting. This PR consolidates such instances by combining multiple context managers into single `with` statements, separated by commas.
- **Consider using `in`:** Checking for membership in sequences or collections using multiple `or` conditions can be verbose. The `in` operator provides a more Pythonic and concise way to perform these checks, and has been applied to simplify such conditions in the codebase.
- **`f-string` used without any expression:** Using an f-string without any embedded expressions (e.g., `f"text"`) incurs unnecessary parsing overhead. These instances have been converted to regular string literals for better performance and clarity, as no dynamic formatting was intended.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants