-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 706
Take adjoint into account in xDSL MergeRotationsPass/merge_rotations_pass
#8429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v0.43.0-rc0 #8429 +/- ##
==============================================
Coverage ? 99.42%
==============================================
Files ? 584
Lines ? 61250
Branches ? 0
==============================================
Hits ? 60898
Misses ? 352
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
pennylane/compiler/python_compiler/transforms/quantum/merge_rotations.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pennylane/compiler/python_compiler/transforms/quantum/merge_rotations.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…tations.py Co-authored-by: Mudit Pandey <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks Great! Thanks for catching and fixing this bug! 🚀
Context:
Adjoints are not handled correctly, see linked issue
Description of the Change:
Handle them correctly.
Benefits:
Bug fix
Possible Drawbacks:
N/A
Related GitHub Issues:
[sc-100982]
fixes #8428