Skip to content

Conversation

jmthomas
Copy link
Member

closes #567

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (86a8498) 74.31% compared to head (68ab766) 74.31%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #635   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.31%   74.31%           
=======================================
  Files         460      460           
  Lines       28545    28545           
  Branches      588      588           
=======================================
  Hits        21214    21214           
  Misses       7237     7237           
  Partials       94       94           
Flag Coverage Δ
ruby-api 50.96% <ø> (ø)
ruby-backend 78.44% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
openc3/lib/openc3/version.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

// The value of '0 10 100%' was achieved through trial and error
// The larger flex-shrink value was critical for success
style['flex'] = '0 10 100%' // flex-grow, flex-shrink, flex-basis
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With a defined width, don't you still want to right justify?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's all about the flex, not the justify. Pull and see.

@jmthomas jmthomas merged commit 042a602 into main Apr 24, 2023
@jmthomas jmthomas deleted the justify branch April 24, 2023 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Justify LABELVALUE widget
2 participants