Skip to content

Conversation

@MarkSiedle
Copy link
Contributor

@MarkSiedle MarkSiedle commented Sep 17, 2024

As owners of the Security area and as part of this request for R&D in Q3, the Backend Foundations Team are updating the screenshots to match the latest Vertical Navigation design (or remove layout concerns from screenshots where appropriate).

Reviewer notes:

  • I don't recommend going to the trouble of running this up locally, as docs and server have different pnpm versions and you will have a bad time 🙋 . Instead, if you could just eye-ball the image diffs and confirm they are effectively same-same with with the newer design, that would be much appreciated 🙇
  • There are no width/height conditions on our doc images, and CSS styling will apply rounded corners to cover up any slight discrepancies on the edges
  • In many cases, we've opted to crop the existing image content, rather than go through the effort of setting up the same scenario locally for a new screenshot. This still gives customers enough of a screenshot hint, without the old design confusion

Sometimes, a team will be granted contributor access to a project, but be restricted in the environments that it can access. By default, Octopus's security system will then prevent members of the team editing [variables](/docs/projects/variables) that apply outside of their allowed environments. During development this can be inconvenient, as variables frequently need to be added in support of new application features.

## Why restrict editing of unscoped variables? {#Securityandun-scopedvariables-Whyrestricteditingofun-scopedvariables?}
## Why restrict editing of unscoped variables? {#why-restrict-editing-of-unscoped-variables}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I followed the same approach Steve Fenton used in this previous PR where we encountered this: 2bd1155#diff-1e8a102c0408e76c53dd207562893eff2122c73073bd5e5f1da9dbb7f399b467

And confirmed there's no anchor link references to these that needed updating.

@MarkSiedle MarkSiedle marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 00:53
Copy link
Contributor

@desruc desruc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't spin this up locally, but I went through each image and confirmed that they are like for like.

@MarkSiedle MarkSiedle merged commit ccff9eb into main Sep 18, 2024
@MarkSiedle MarkSiedle deleted the bft/security-screenshots branch September 18, 2024 06:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants