Skip to content

[18.0][IMP] stock_request: Remove allocation_ids from a view and improve stock.view_move_form layout #84

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
OCA-git-bot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2025
Merged

[18.0][IMP] stock_request: Remove allocation_ids from a view and improve stock.view_move_form layout #84

OCA-git-bot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2025

Conversation

@JoanSForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

@JoanSForgeFlow JoanSForgeFlow commented Nov 29, 2025

Remove allocation_ids from a view where it does not apply and improve stock.view_move_form layout.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented Nov 29, 2025

Hi @LoisRForgeFlow, @etobella,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@JoanSForgeFlow JoanSForgeFlow changed the title [IMP] stock_request: removes allocations from stock.view_stock_move_operations and improves in stock.view_move_form [18.0][IMP] stock_request: removes allocations from stock.view_stock_move_operations and improves in stock.view_move_form Nov 29, 2025
@JoanSForgeFlow JoanSForgeFlow changed the title [18.0][IMP] stock_request: removes allocations from stock.view_stock_move_operations and improves in stock.view_move_form [18.0][IMP] stock_request: Remove allocation_ids from a view and improve stock.view_move_form layout. Nov 29, 2025
@JoanSForgeFlow JoanSForgeFlow changed the title [18.0][IMP] stock_request: Remove allocation_ids from a view and improve stock.view_move_form layout. [18.0][IMP] stock_request: Remove allocation_ids from a view and improve stock.view_move_form layout Nov 29, 2025
@JoanSForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor Author

JoanSForgeFlow commented Nov 29, 2025

The CI test errors are related to stock_return_request, not to this module.

@JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member

JordiBForgeFlow commented Dec 1, 2025

@JoanSForgeFlow tests are failing

@JoanSForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor Author

JoanSForgeFlow commented Dec 1, 2025

@JordiBForgeFlow The failing tests are related to stock_return_request. This PR fixes them: #85

@JoanSForgeFlow
[IMP] stock_request: removes allocations from stock.view_stock_move_o…
8457cd5 
…perations and improves in stock.view_move_form
@JoanSForgeFlow JoanSForgeFlow force-pushed the 18.0-imp-remove-alllocations_from-view_stock_move_operations branch from b55c5db to 8457cd5 Compare December 1, 2025 14:20
@JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member

JordiBForgeFlow commented Dec 1, 2025

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 18.0-ocabot-merge-pr-84-by-JordiBForgeFlow-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2025
@OCA-git-bot
Merge PR #84 into 18.0
2218bf4 
Signed-off-by JordiBForgeFlow
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented Dec 1, 2025

It looks like something changed on 18.0 in the meantime.
Let me try again (no action is required from you).
Prepared branch 18.0-ocabot-merge-pr-84-by-JordiBForgeFlow-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 06ded08 into OCA:18.0 Dec 1, 2025
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 89e2f08. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@MiquelRForgeFlow MiquelRForgeFlow deleted the 18.0-imp-remove-alllocations_from-view_stock_move_operations branch December 1, 2025 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@etobella etobella etobella approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

merged 🎉

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@JoanSForgeFlow @OCA-git-bot @JordiBForgeFlow @etobella