Meeting 2020-08-27

[Mic92]

General business

Present in the meeting: @edolstra, @Mic92, @lheckemann

Agenda for today:

Unlabeled RFCs and New RFCs

RFCs Open for Nominations

• RFC 75 - Declarative wrappers

• RFC 67 - Common override interface derivations - nominations so far: @Taneb, @infinisil - asked B4dM4n, 7c6f434c but no response — Linus will ping

• RFC 74 - Community Coordination Hub - open for nominations, currently it looks like it lacks a bit of supporters?

RFCs in Discussion

• RFC 68 - Minimal daemon - no news since last tiem

• RFC 72 - switch to CommonMark for documentation meeting took place

• RFC 17 - Intensional Store - no news suspended progress made in rfc 62

• RFC 32 - Phase running changes for better nix-shell use - @lheckemann wanted arrange meeting, not happend yet, needs globin (author) to be available for a meeting - no news

• RFC 42 - NixOS settings options - @Mic92 joined as a leader and needs to schedule a meeting

• RFC 58 - Named Ellipses - in hibernation pending author input,

• RFC 62 - Content-addressed paths - ongoing work

• RFC 70 - Merge nixos-hardware in to nixpkgs - meeting took place, rfc needs update

• RFC 71 - Retired Committers Amendment - is FCP without deadline, can be merged.

RFCs in FCP

None

Accepted/Rejected/Closed

• RFC 59 - Systemd Service Secrets

Leader of next meeting

@spacekookie will lead the next meeting - @edolstra is on vacation

pad.mayflower.de/nixos-rfc-steering-committee

[blaggacao]

RFC 74 - Community Coordination Hub - open for nominations, currently it looks like it lacks a bit of supporters?

It does, ideally I'd like to merge those some of those ides with either @samueldr (wiki) or @garbas (page) and see if this can be repurposed. Alternatively, we can close it and wait for RFC72 and what it brings about and re-try later on. I'd really like to get feedback from the two gentlemen, though.

[Mic92]

RFC 74 - Community Coordination Hub - open for nominations, currently it looks like it lacks a bit of supporters?

It does, ideally I'd like to merge those some of those ides with either @samueldr (wiki) or @garbas (page) and see if this can be repurposed. Alternatively, we can close it and wait for RFC72 and what it brings about and re-try later on. I'd really like to get feedback from the two gentlemen, though.

Fair enough. It would be also up to the shepherds to decide about the RFC, we only assign shepherds in those meetings.

[blaggacao]

Since the revival of NixFridays, I might also choose to plug RFC74 into that feedback loop, since the motivation still stands. ;-)

[lheckemann]

@sphalerite is not me ;)