Skip to content

Conversation

jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo commented Sep 5, 2025

While writing the architecture documentation it became apparent that the loaders shouldn't be under the recipes, and should instead be their own top level directory.

By doing this now we can avoid the pain of people having to know of the change of location.

Contribution checklist

Aim to have all relevant checks ticked off before merging. See the developer's guide for more detail.

  • Documentation has been updated to reflect change. (I've updated the architecture PR.)
  • New code has tests, and affected old tests have been updated.
  • All tests and CI checks pass.
  • Ensured the pull request title is descriptive.
  • Conda lock files have been updated if dependencies have changed.
  • Attributed any Generative AI, such as GitHub Copilot, used in this PR.
  • Marked the PR as ready to review.

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo self-assigned this Sep 5, 2025
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo added the cleanup Non-functional improvement label Sep 5, 2025
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo force-pushed the move_loaders branch 2 times, most recently from 49f65db to 26e5cf2 Compare September 5, 2025 21:05
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Coverage

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2025 21:19
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo requested a review from daflack September 5, 2025 21:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cleanup Non-functional improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant