Skip to content

EXT_implicit_ellipsoid_region Proposal #2494

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

j9liu
Copy link

@j9liu j9liu commented Jun 11, 2025

This extension proposal builds on top of KHR_implicit_shapes (#2370) to enable the definition of implicit ellipsoid-based regions. This is useful in geospatial applications where regions are defined in longitude / latitude / height coordinates relative to an ellipsoid model, e.g., the WGS84 ellipsoid.

This enables the rendering of ellipsoid-conforming voxels in EXT_primitive_voxels (#2496), allowing larger regions of data to follow the ellipsoid's surface more closely and improve the real-world accuracy of the data over uniform box voxels.

@aaronfranke
Copy link
Contributor

The EXT prefix is reserved for multi-vendor extensions. Which vendors besides Cesium have worked on this?

@javagl
Copy link
Contributor

javagl commented Jun 25, 2025

Multiple vendors working on a specific extension is not (or no longer) a strict requirement for the EXT_ prefix. The informal meaning of that prefix is rather something like the vendor ~"not claiming the (naming) rights".
(Most of the open extension PRs are using the EXT_ prefix, FWIW. The exceptions are mainly the KHR_ ones, which is not much more than the "Khronos vendor prefix" nowadays)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants