Use nameof instead of Type.name.name #296

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Merged

vchuravy merged 1 commit into JuliaCI:master from jishnub:nameof

Nov 13, 2022

Contributor

jishnub commented Nov 12, 2022

nameof does the same thing, and is public


          Use nameof instead of Type.name.name

5c598b0

Member

vchuravy commented Nov 12, 2022

When was nameof first introduced?

Contributor Author

jishnub commented Nov 13, 2022

It's available on v1.0

vchuravy merged commit cca3e8c into JuliaCI:master

jishnub deleted the nameof branch

November 13, 2022 18:09

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet