Skip to content

Conversation

@skoranda
Copy link
Contributor

@skoranda skoranda commented Jun 2, 2017

Fix for #101

It is acceptable SAML2 to have an with
a that includes the AllowCreate attribute but
that does not include the Format attribute. When the SAML2
frontend receives such a request it should default to the
metadata for the SP to determine which Format the SP requires.
Before this commit SATOSA would ignore the SP metadata in such
a case and use a transient format.

It is acceptable SAML2 to have an <AuthnRequest> with
a <NameIDPolicy> that includes the AllowCreate attribute but
that does not include the Format attribute. When the SAML2
frontend receives such a request it should default to the
metadata for the SP to determine which Format the SP requires.
Before this commit SATOSA would ignore the SP metadata in such
a case and use a transient format.
@johanlundberg johanlundberg merged commit 2daaaa0 into IdentityPython:master Jun 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants