chore: remove old code samples

[katiemn]

Description

Remove outdated code samples, these samples have already been removed from the corresponding docs

[snippet-bot]

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to delete 1 region tag.

• ai-platform/snippets/imagen-verify-image-watermark.js:20, tag generativeaionvertexai_imagen_verify_image_watermark

---

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

• Refresh this comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @katiemn, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request, authored by katiemn, removes outdated code samples from the repository. Specifically, it removes the imagen-verify-image-watermark.js file and updates ai-platform/snippets/test/imagen.test.js to remove the corresponding test case. The PR description indicates that these samples have already been removed from the corresponding documentation.

Highlights

• Code Removal: The primary change is the removal of the ai-platform/snippets/imagen-verify-image-watermark.js file, which contains an outdated code sample for verifying image watermarks.
• Test Update: The test file ai-platform/snippets/test/imagen.test.js is updated to remove the test case associated with the removed code sample.

Changelog

• ai-platform/snippets/imagen-verify-image-watermark.js
  • File completely removed as it contains an outdated code sample.
• ai-platform/snippets/test/imagen.test.js
  • Removed the test case for verifying image watermarks, specifically the it('should verify that an image contains a watermark', ...) block.
  • Updated the describe block to remove the reference to watermark verification.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

Old code fades away,
Tests that were, no longer stay,
A cleaner codebase,
A lighter load to face,
New features light the way.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request aims to remove outdated code samples, which aligns with the goal of maintaining a clean and up-to-date codebase. The removal of the imagen-verify-image-watermark.js file and the corresponding test case in imagen.test.js seems appropriate given the description. However, I've identified a potential issue regarding the removal of the watermark verification functionality, which might impact the overall functionality of the image processing pipeline.

Summary of Findings

• Watermark Verification Removal: The removal of the imagen-verify-image-watermark.js file and the corresponding test case in imagen.test.js removes the watermark verification functionality. While the code might be outdated, it's important to ensure that this functionality is either no longer needed or has been replaced by an alternative implementation. If the watermark verification is still required, consider updating the code instead of removing it.

Merge Readiness

The pull request removes outdated code samples as described, but the removal of the watermark verification functionality raises a concern. Before merging, it's crucial to confirm whether this functionality is still required and, if so, whether it has been replaced or needs to be updated. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. At a minimum, the high severity comment should be addressed before merging.