Skip to content

readme: replace headings with alerts #189

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2025

Conversation

bripmccann
Copy link

Used GitHub Flavored Markdown's alerts feature for more semantic markup than using headings. For all the reasons semantic markup is usually good, but on GitHub in particular they add underlines and links and stuff to headings which aren't needed here.

Arguably makes the text stand out less than using headings, but when when everything is a heading, it's hard for anything to stand out.

Used bold and different kinds of alerts to indicate relative importance.

Otherwise, tried to keep refactoring to a minimum.

Used GitHub Flavored Markdown's alerts feature for more semantic markup than using headings. For all the reasons semantic markup is usually good, but on GitHub in particular they add underlines and links and stuff to headings which aren't needed here.

Arguably makes the text stand out less than using headings, but when when everything is a heading, it's hard for anything to stand out.

Used bold and different kinds of alerts to indicate relative importance.

Otherwise, tried to keep refactoring to a minimum.
@InvictusNavarchus
Copy link

InvictusNavarchus commented Aug 11, 2025

Yess, I agree. This is in fact what bothers me the most every time I return to this github repo to update my ProtonGE. There's too many giant headings in the first few lines.

@GloriousEggroll GloriousEggroll merged commit 2af23fe into GloriousEggroll:master Aug 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants