-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
A few doc tweaks that slowed me down and could have been clearer #55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
doc tweak
doc tweak
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@liorkesos has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
51-51: LGTM! Good catch adding the missing import
Adding the import json statement improves code completeness and prevents confusion, as it's required for the ontology serialization/deserialization operations shown in the example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
examples/trip/demo_orchestrator_trip.ipynb (3)
Line range hint
70-146: Consider unifying reusable entities and relations across ontologies.
Therestaurants_ontologyandattractions_ontologydefineCountryandCityin very similar ways. Consolidating these into a shared ontology or a base class may reduce duplication and ease future maintenance.
Line range hint
186-210: Add disclaimers or usage notes for end-users.
The specialized agents (restaurants, attractions) provide suggestions that might need disclaimers on opening hours, reservation constraints, or availability. Explore adding user-facing disclaimers or usage guidance.
Line range hint
212-224: Consider concurrency or parallel agent execution.
Although the Orchestrator currently manages queries in a straightforward manner, you might eventually benefit from concurrent requests to multiple agents, especially if queries are long-running or data-intensive.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
examples/trip/demo_orchestrator_trip.ipynb(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
examples/trip/demo_orchestrator_trip.ipynb (3)
58-58: Great addition of the anchor link.
This anchor makes it easier for readers to jump to the “Ontology - Predefined Ontology” section, improving navigability in the notebook.
Line range hint
149-183: Add robust error handling for data loading and node creation.
When parsing JSON data and populating the Knowledge Graph, consider handling malformed or missing fields. This helps avoid potential runtime errors and ensures data integrity in production environments.Would you like me to open a new issue to track the implementation of validation checks and error handling for JSON data?
Line range hint
226-241: Looks good!
The final demonstration queries effectively showcase the orchestrator’s query handling and the agents’ knowledge retrieval.
|
@liorkesos Thank you for contributing! |
Summary by CodeRabbit
import jsonin the code snippet for better clarity.