-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 513
Issue #2801: SA1500 fires for the while clause of do/while statement #3196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bfbb4ca
Issue #2801: SA1500 fires for the while clause of do/while statement
Kevin-Andrew a965593
Merge remote-tracking branch 'DotNetAnalyzers/master' into dowhile
sharwell 3163cdf
Simplify testing and cover code fixes
sharwell 036d8e9
Simplify syntax checks by using Parent instead of GetPreviousToken
sharwell c58307c
Clarify documentation
sharwell File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since I don't know the syntax tree well enough, I just want to make sure, as I had similar code and this same question elsewhere, "Is using
.Parent.Parent
safe here?" We know thatopenBraceToken.Parent
is notnull
and is of kindBlock
, but does that guarantee that.Parent.Parent
will never benull
? For example what if I have code like the following that uses some extra curly braces for scoping:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IsKind
allows null, andopenBraceToken.Parent.IsKind(SyntaxKind.Block)
is only true ifopenBraceToken.Parent
is not null.