chore(infra): add pde setup details for @adarsh #182
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @lostnull, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on integrating a new user, 'adarsh', into the existing infrastructure by setting up their personal development environment (PDE). The changes involve granting 'adarsh' access to encrypted secrets, configuring their dedicated Helm environment values, updating DNS records, adding their SSH public key for system access, and establishing WireGuard VPN connectivity. This comprehensive setup ensures 'adarsh' has the necessary permissions and network access to begin development within the established infrastructure.
Highlights
- Secret Access Management: The pull request grants 'adarsh' the necessary permissions to decrypt and encrypt secrets managed by SOPS across various infrastructure components, including Kubernetes, Helm, Terraform, and Dockerhub secrets.
- Personal Development Environment (PDE) Setup: A dedicated Helm values file has been introduced for 'adarsh's personal development environment (PDE), setting up a unique ingress host at 'adarsh.bud.studio' and disabling 'keel' for their specific deployment.
- DNS Integration: 'Adarsh' has been added to the DNS configuration, allowing for the creation and management of DNS records pertinent to their development environment.
- User Access and VPN Configuration: SSH public key and WireGuard VPN configurations have been added for 'adarsh', enabling secure shell access to NixOS systems and secure connectivity to internal networks.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
lostnull
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds the necessary infrastructure configuration for a new user, 'adarsh', to set up a personal development environment. The changes span across SOPS encryption keys, Helm values, Terraform DNS configuration, NixOS user setup, and WireGuard peer configuration. The changes are consistent and correctly follow the existing patterns. I have one suggestion to improve the maintainability of the .sops.yaml file by reducing key duplication.
No description provided.