Skip to content

Conversation

PabloCastellano
Copy link
Member

@PabloCastellano PabloCastellano commented Jun 6, 2025

Checklist

  • My change requires a documentation update, and I have done it.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have filled out the description and linked the related issues.

Description

The Swarm TTL is not updated if SWARM_STORAGE_ENABLED=false, e.g. when Swarm storage is temporarily disabled.

Motivation and Context (Optional)

Related Issue (Optional)

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 6, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6c865e9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
blobscan-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 6, 2025 5:27pm
blobscan-staging ❌ Failed (Inspect) Jun 6, 2025 5:27pm
4 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
blobscan-gnosis ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 6, 2025 5:27pm
blobscan-holesky ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 6, 2025 5:27pm
blobscan-mainnet ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 6, 2025 5:27pm
blobscan-sepolia ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 6, 2025 5:27pm

@PabloCastellano PabloCastellano changed the title fix: linting fix: run SwarmStampSyncer when a batch id has been previously configured Jun 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2025

📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for @blobscan/web

This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖

This PR introduced no changes to the JavaScript bundle! 🙌

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.57%. Comparing base (f1ea7b3) to head (6c865e9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #801   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.57%   87.57%           
=======================================
  Files         168      168           
  Lines       12130    12130           
  Branches     1245     1245           
=======================================
  Hits        10623    10623           
  Misses       1507     1507           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ import type { PublicClient } from "viem";
import { createPublicClient, http } from "viem";
import * as chains from "viem/chains";

import { prisma } from "@blobscan/db";
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be a procedure

@PabloCastellano PabloCastellano requested a review from PJColombo July 2, 2025 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant