Skip to content

Conversation

@Uzaaft
Copy link
Member

@Uzaaft Uzaaft commented May 14, 2025

No description provided.

@Uzaaft Uzaaft requested a review from azdanov May 14, 2025 10:53
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 14, 2025

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

  • If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

  • If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

  • Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

  • README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

  • Entry returns a single plugin spec with the new plugin as the only top level spec (not applicable for recipes or packs).

  • Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

  • Proper usage of specs table for all specs that are not dependencies of a given plugin (not applicable for recipes or packs).

@Uzaaft Uzaaft mentioned this pull request May 14, 2025
@Uzaaft Uzaaft force-pushed the fix/vscode-nvim branch from 88d61cf to f2b36e6 Compare May 14, 2025 10:55
@Uzaaft Uzaaft force-pushed the fix/vscode-nvim branch from f2b36e6 to a3906da Compare May 14, 2025 11:08
Copy link
Contributor

@azdanov azdanov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@azdanov azdanov merged commit 81cccf6 into main May 14, 2025
16 checks passed
@azdanov azdanov deleted the fix/vscode-nvim branch May 14, 2025 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants