-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 744
Chat: reliability enhancements #1289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
peterbarker
merged 5 commits into
ArduPilot:master
from
rmackay9:chat-reliability-enhancements
Dec 27, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bee8b1d
chat: assistant instructions to check state after arming, disarming o…
rmackay9 78b3804
chat: assistant instructions emphasize checking the vehicle type
rmackay9 eeb049f
chat: assistant instructions for changing yaw using CONDITION_YAW
rmackay9 11d60f0
chat: assistant instructions to try and improve takeoff reliability
rmackay9 316be97
chat: handle command ack
rmackay9 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can't dis-ambiguate the results anyway! I've pushed for the addition of an "opaque ID" supplied in the
COMMAND_INTmessage and returned in aCOMMAND_ACKto fix that problem, but didn't ever get traction on it...You can ensure you never send a second command of a specific type while one is outstanding based on your dictionary, 'though. You would then need a timeout as the ACK may get lost.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok thanks. The way the chat module works at the moment, the commands are only sent one-by-one and after sending it immediately waits for the ACK so there's actually no way for it to be waiting for two command_acks. It could still pickup the wrong ACK though if that ACK is in response to a similar command from some other sender... and your proposed change would help with that so I'm all for it.
BTW I could have simplified the dictionary down to just a single name-value pair but in python a dictionary is so easy to use I went with it.