-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.3k
Description
Is your feature request related to a specific problem? Or an existing feature?
The AddStrategy extension methods take a ResilienceStrategyOptions options argument, which gets validated using DataAnnotations. This makes the method incompatible with trimming and native AOT, and it is annotated as such:
Polly/src/Polly.Core/ResiliencePipelineBuilderExtensions.cs
Lines 68 to 70 in 82474bf
| [RequiresUnreferencedCode(Constants.OptionsValidation)] | |
| public static TBuilder AddStrategy<TBuilder>(this TBuilder builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy> factory, ResilienceStrategyOptions options) | |
| where TBuilder : ResiliencePipelineBuilderBase |
Polly/src/Polly.Core/ResiliencePipelineBuilderExtensions.cs
Lines 90 to 93 in 82474bf
| [RequiresUnreferencedCode(Constants.OptionsValidation)] | |
| public static ResiliencePipelineBuilder AddStrategy( | |
| this ResiliencePipelineBuilder builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy<object>> factory, | |
| ResilienceStrategyOptions options) |
Polly/src/Polly.Core/ResiliencePipelineBuilderExtensions.cs
Lines 114 to 117 in 82474bf
| [RequiresUnreferencedCode(Constants.OptionsValidation)] | |
| public static ResiliencePipelineBuilder<TResult> AddStrategy<TResult>( | |
| this ResiliencePipelineBuilder<TResult> builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy<TResult>> factory, | |
| ResilienceStrategyOptions options) |
Callers who want to use this API in a trim compatible way need to define an empty class derived from ResilienceStrategyOptions and suppress the warning from calling this API.
Describe the solution you'd like
We should add overloads to these AddStrategy methods that are trim compatible, and don't take an options argument. Similar to the AddPipeline methods.
[RequiresUnreferencedCode(Constants.OptionsValidation)]
public static TBuilder AddStrategy<TBuilder>(this TBuilder builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy> factory, ResilienceStrategyOptions options)
where TBuilder : ResiliencePipelineBuilderBase {}
+public static TBuilder AddStrategy<TBuilder>(this TBuilder builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy> factory)
+ where TBuilder : ResiliencePipelineBuilderBase {}
[RequiresUnreferencedCode(Constants.OptionsValidation)]
public static ResiliencePipelineBuilder AddStrategy(
this ResiliencePipelineBuilder builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy<object>> factory,
ResilienceStrategyOptions options) {}
+public static ResiliencePipelineBuilder AddStrategy(
+ this ResiliencePipelineBuilder builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy<object>> factory) {}
[RequiresUnreferencedCode(Constants.OptionsValidation)]
public static ResiliencePipelineBuilder<TResult> AddStrategy<TResult>(
this ResiliencePipelineBuilder<TResult> builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy<TResult>> factory,
ResilienceStrategyOptions options) {}
+ public static ResiliencePipelineBuilder<TResult> AddStrategy<TResult>(
+ this ResiliencePipelineBuilder<TResult> builder, Func<StrategyBuilderContext, ResilienceStrategy<TResult>> factory) {}Additional context
This is being used by Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Resilience here:
dotnet/extensions#4962 (comment)
Adding this API would make the caller simpler. It wouldn't need to declare an empty class, and suppress the trim warning.