Document history API

[mnquintana]

Some currently undocumented methods of the history API (like getFragment) are very useful for users of this package - any change you'd consider documenting them publicly? 😄

[wraithgar]

Yes! Absolutely. Documentation is extremely helpful and important. The general rule of thumb in the past has been that if it's documented, it should have test coverage. A quick scan of the existing tests seems to indicate that this is already the case with getFragment.

If this is something you're considering, please know that documentation updates are very easy to get merged in. They only require one person on the team to see it, like it, and merge it in.

If you don't want to do this, no problem. We will leave this issue here and try to get some momentum on it. Thanks for this suggestion.