New trial build for esm1.6 using generic tracers and iceberg freshwater fluxes in cice4

[chrisb13]

---

🚀 The latest prerelease access-esm1p6/pr27-6 at 984fe5d is here: #27 (comment) 🚀

[github-actions]

🚀 Deploying access-esm1.6 dev_2024.12.0 as prerelease pr27-3 with commit 5095ab7

Details and usage instructions

This access-esm1.6 model will be deployed as:

• dev_2024.12.0 as a Release (when merged).
• pr27-3 as a Prerelease (during this PR).

This Prerelease is accessible on Gadi using:

module use /g/data/vk83/prerelease/modules
module load access-esm1p6/pr27-3

where the binaries shall be on your $PATH.
This Prerelease is also accessible on Gadi via /g/data/vk83/prerelease/apps/spack/0.22/spack in the access-esm1p6-pr27-3 environment.

🛠️ Using: spack 0.22, spack-packages 2024.12.0, spack-config 2024.11.27

Details

It will be deployed using:

• access-nri/spack on branch 0.22
• access-nri/spack-packages version 2024.12.0
• access-nri/spack-config version 2024.11.27

If this is not what was expected, commit changes to config/versions.json.

[access-hive-bot]

This pull request has been mentioned on ACCESS Hive Community Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/csiro-access-nri-standup-minutes/3789/14

[github-actions]

🚀 Deploying access-esm1.6 dev_2024.12.0 as prerelease pr27-4 with commit fa3a855

Details and usage instructions

This access-esm1.6 model will be deployed as:

• dev_2024.12.0 as a Release (when merged).
• pr27-4 as a Prerelease (during this PR).

This Prerelease is accessible on Gadi using:

module use /g/data/vk83/prerelease/modules
module load access-esm1p6/pr27-4

where the binaries shall be on your $PATH.
This Prerelease is also accessible on Gadi via /g/data/vk83/prerelease/apps/spack/0.22/spack in the access-esm1p6-pr27-4 environment.

🛠️ Using: spack 0.22, spack-packages 2024.12.0, spack-config 2024.11.27

Details

It will be deployed using:

• access-nri/spack on branch 0.22
• access-nri/spack-packages version 2024.12.0
• access-nri/spack-config version 2024.11.27

If this is not what was expected, commit changes to config/versions.json.

[CodeGat]

!redeploy

[github-actions]

🚀 Deploying access-esm1.6 dev_2024.12.0 as prerelease pr27-5 with commit fa3a855

Details and usage instructions

This access-esm1.6 model will be deployed as:

• dev_2024.12.0 as a Release (when merged).
• pr27-5 as a Prerelease (during this PR).

This Prerelease is accessible on Gadi using:

module use /g/data/vk83/prerelease/modules
module load access-esm1p6/pr27-5

where the binaries shall be on your $PATH.
This Prerelease is also accessible on Gadi via /g/data/vk83/prerelease/apps/spack/0.22/spack in the access-esm1p6-pr27-5 environment.

🛠️ Using: spack 0.22, spack-packages 2024.12.0, spack-config 2024.11.27

Details

It will be deployed using:

• access-nri/spack on branch 0.22
• access-nri/spack-packages version 2024.12.0
• access-nri/spack-config version 2024.11.27

If this is not what was expected, commit changes to config/versions.json.

[CodeGat]

Seems to me like pr27-4 is equivalent to pr27-5: https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-ESM1.6/actions/runs/12365231802/job/34509896472#step:9:669

[access-hive-bot]

This pull request has been mentioned on ACCESS Hive Community Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/esm1-6-spin-up-experiments/4219/1

[dougiesquire]

@chrisb13, @blimlim can we close this PR? It's an outdated version of #31 and I don't think we're aware of anyone using the prereleases.

[blimlim]

I believe this one can be closed!

[chrisb13]

What happens to the access-esm1p6/pr27-5 exe/pre-release if we close it? I note that it was used for the current spin up candidate years 0-222 here @pearseb. I would think we want to keep a hold of those (or at least the build/compile environment that made it)?

[dougiesquire]

The prerelease deployment will get deleted when the PR is closed. @CodeGat is the spack.lock held on to somewhere?

[manodeep]

My performance testing (details here) is based on that exe - access-esm1p6/pr27-5

[dougiesquire]

My performance testing (#45) is based on that exe - access-esm1p6/pr27-5

Okay, so would you prefer to keep this open?

[manodeep]

Depends! I want to confirm deterministic results and performance runtimes - does this exe differ significantly from the latest version? Performance benchmarking results depend on the exe, and if the exe has changed significantly, then those (old) results may not be meaningful any more.

I am happy to wait and re-do the benchmarking work if there is a sense that the source code will stabilise and/or big PRs are coming in soon.

[dougiesquire]

Let's leave this open for the time being

[CodeGat]

The prerelease deployment will get deleted when the PR is closed. @CodeGat is the spack.lock held on to somewhere?

Yes, in the linked workflow run under artifacts

[github-actions]

🚀 Attempted to deploy access-esm1p6 Prerelease pr27-6 with commit 984fe5d

🖥️ Gadi Deployment ✔️

Usage Instructions

This access-esm1.6 model will be deployed to Gadi as:

• dev_2024.12.0 as a Release (when merged).
• pr27-6 as a Prerelease (during this PR).

This Prerelease is accessible on Gadi using:

module use /g/data/vk83/prerelease/modules
module load access-esm1p6/pr27-6

When using the above modules, the binaries shall be on your $PATH.

For advanced users, this Prerelease is also accessible on Gadi via /g/data/vk83/prerelease/apps/spack/0.22/spack in the access-esm1p6-pr27-6 environment.

Configuration Information

This Prerelease is deployed using:

• access-nri/spack on branch 0.22
• access-nri/spack-packages version 2024.12.0
• access-nri/spack-config version 2025.02.1

If the above was not what was expected, commit changes to config/versions.json in this PR.

[ccarouge]

@CodeGat is looking at freeing some inodes on vk83, so I decided to come and bug folks with older open PRs. Tommy is happy to manually delete some pre-releases that are not needed if you want to keep the PR open. That means if you only need one exe, please tell Tommy which other ones can be removed.

[ccarouge]

I forgot to mention folks, @chrisb13 @dougiesquire @manodeep , see my previous message if you didn't get a notification already.

[blimlim]

@ccarouge 27-5 was used in the spinup, but unsure if any of the other builds are still needed.