PIM-SM over GRE and VPN config issue #201
Unanswered
kkatsaros-dcat
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 9 replies
-
I'm not sure I understand your setup, and the report was quite hard to read. I tried to add some Markdown markup to fix things ... From what I can see, HOST-A doesn't seem to find any PIM neighbors, so a bit hard to do some routing then. You don't show how you've set up your GRE tunnel, but I suspect you've forgot to set the MULTICAST interface flag. I actually wrote a blog post about this a few years ago that might be helpful. Please let me know if it works for you. https://troglobit.com/2016/07/05/multicast-routing-with-pim-sm-over-gre/ Also, this is more of a support issue rather than bug report, so I'm moving this to Discussions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
9 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I have been using the Linux distro of pimd (v 2.3.2) and my setup looks like this.
I have a host-A connecting over VPN to our Firewall which acts also as router with PIM-SM/IGMPv2
I have a GRE tunnel from Host-A over the VPN link (the gpd0 interface) to pass the multicast traffic terminating to the Firewall.
A second host-B (actually a VM in an openstack) is attached to the firewall through a switch.
Both the tun1 and eth1/1120 interfaces in the firewall are part of the same virtual router and I can confirm unicast routing from one to the other.
[HOST-A]
[HOST-B]
PIM-SM is running on both hosts (pimd) and on the Firewall.
[HOST-A]
[HOST-B]
The RP is set up on the Firewall is 10.100.122.1
My pimd.conf config file looks like this
[HOST A]
[HOST B]
Firewall config


It has identified PIM neighbours
I'm using mcjoin to test the multicast, with te sender in the HOST-B and receiver in HOST-A but with no luck.
dc5g (10.100.125.2@gre1) [Help | Toggle | Quit] Fri Sep 24 17:22:57 2021
Source,Group Plotter Rate Bytes Packets
*,239.1.2.3 \ [ ] 0.0k 0.0k 0
Time Log
Fri Sep 24 17:22:12 2021 Joining (*,239.1.2.3) on gre1, ifindex: 14, sd: 5
Fri Sep 24 17:22:58 2021 *,239.1.2.3: invalid 0 delay 0 gaps 0 reorder 0 dupes 0 bytes 0 packets 0
Fri Sep 24 17:22:58 2021 Total: 0 packets
Fri Sep 24 17:22:58 2021 Uptime: 46s
mcjoin :: sending multicast 14s
5gf-vm3 (10.100.120.7@ens3) [Help | Toggle | Quit] Fri Sep 24 16:22:59 2021
Source,Group Plotter Packets
*,239.1.2.3 \ [...............................................................................................................] 141
Time Log
Fri Sep 24 16:22:45 2021 Sending IPv4 multicast on ens3 addr, 10.100.120.7 ifindex: 2, sd: 5
Fri Sep 24 16:22:59 2021 *,239.1.2.3: invalid 0 delay 0 gaps 0 reorder 0 dupes 0 bytes 14100 packets 141
Fri Sep 24 16:22:59 2021 Total: 141 packets
Fri Sep 24 16:22:59 2021 Uptime: 14s
My concern is if the pimd.comf is correctly created. I am not an expert in multicast to be honest. Any support would be appreciated.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions