Requires code_teams and package_protections setup #11
Replies: 5 comments
-
|
Hey @oskarpearson thanks for filing this. It's definitely the intention that this gem can be used gradually and without having fully configured all other gems. As you pointed out, it was a bit simpler with code ownership and code teams, but package protections is a bit more of an investment and change to developer UX. Can you share what error message you're receiving? I've actually been moving Also note that right now this gem works by looking at the metadata in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey @oskarpearson I just pushed up some PRs to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks so much for taking this on so quickly! Really appreciate it. I'll do some experimentation and raise any issues/errors I find in issues or PRs |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@alexevanczuk The updates that you've done worked for me Your comment above refers to 1.38.0, but that doesn't appear at https://rubygems.org/gems/modularization_statistics so I pointed at the git repo's master for my testing. There's no tag for it at https://github.com/rubyatscale/modularization_statistics/tags either. Did you mean to do a release? Or were you wanting feedback before doing so? I added a github issue for some improvements #14 - am happy to submit a PR if you think the direction there is right Thanks again for the gem and for your help! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Whoops @oskarpearson – CD had failed. I fixed the issue and it should be out now. I'll check out your issue! Thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi All
I really like the idea of this gem (since I've previously implemented something pretty similar!)
On attempting to use it, I've found that I need to configure the following to get useable output:
Is the intention that this gem could be used independently of the other gems without all of them being configured? If so, I guess I should raise issues for the above?
The code_ownership and code_teams dependencies are not necessarily a problem, though a little unexpected since not covered in the docs. (I needed to add
code_ownership.ymlandconfig/teamsfiles to get things to work) Ideally I'd like to use the data from the package.yml filesHowever
package_protectionsis a bit more wide-ranging. I would like to be able to use this gem without configuring all packages to have the relevant metadata, since I've not investigated that yet and got the whole team to buy into it.Thanks again for the gem!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions