Skip to content

Conversation

@LecrisUT
Copy link
Contributor

I believe the harm of ref-names outweigh the benefits of it, especially since this is mostly dependent on the git host provider that would produce the git archive.

Closes #806

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, its unfortunate as this also looses the branch name (which is sometimes needed)
but the branch name was only ever included in the branch head to begin with

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The documented .git_archival.txt causes git archives to change hash after first post-release commit is made

2 participants