You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was hoping you could help me understand the usage of AR_3D_factor within the compute_section_aerodynamics method. This lives within the compute_section_aerodynamics in the wing_aerodynamics method of the AeroBuildup class (line 816 of aero_buildup.py on your current master branch at the time of posting).
I realize this is a 2D -> 3D correction, taking into account some basic geometry parameters, coming from aerolib.CL_over_Cl. When calculing the sect_CL, we take the AR_3D_factor and raise it to the power of 1/5. I was wondering why we don't use the parameter as-is, and why the fifth power is used?
I looked at comparing an alpha sweep against higher fidelity analysis (outside of asb) and it does seem to be quite far off. Admittedly it was for a wing with an aspect ratio of two, so this is likely pushing the correction pretty far!
Just wondered if you could give some reasoning on the 1/5 power.
Thanks for all your ASB work, really an amazing tool!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Peter,
I was hoping you could help me understand the usage of
AR_3D_factor
within thecompute_section_aerodynamics
method. This lives within thecompute_section_aerodynamics
in thewing_aerodynamics
method of theAeroBuildup
class (line 816 ofaero_buildup.py
on your current master branch at the time of posting).I realize this is a 2D -> 3D correction, taking into account some basic geometry parameters, coming from
aerolib.CL_over_Cl
. When calculing thesect_CL
, we take theAR_3D_factor
and raise it to the power of 1/5. I was wondering why we don't use the parameter as-is, and why the fifth power is used?I looked at comparing an alpha sweep against higher fidelity analysis (outside of asb) and it does seem to be quite far off. Admittedly it was for a wing with an aspect ratio of two, so this is likely pushing the correction pretty far!
Just wondered if you could give some reasoning on the 1/5 power.
Thanks for all your ASB work, really an amazing tool!
Will
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions