Full Bootstrap of Archive Node

[erockstroh]

Hello!

We want to bootstrap an archive node that contains both post-bedrock and pre-bedrock data. For that, we followed the documentation outlined here: https://reth.rs/run/sync-op-mainnet.html#full-bootstrap-not-recommended

We are aware of the risks!

Following the documentation, we encountered multiple issues:

1. The only archive data available pre-bedrock on https://datadirs.optimism.io/ is mainnet-legacy-archival.tar.zst. Running the migration script on that data rejects the bedrock head height of 105 235 063 because the data only goes up until 105 235 062. We built the source https://github.com/testinprod-io/op-geth/tree/pcw109550/bedrock-db-migration and used that as a docker image.

2. Import does not work with the latest op-reth release 1.2.2. We had to use 1.0.8 to be able to import the data. 1.2.2 always complained about the blocks.rlp file not containing a valid tip.

3. After data import, we ran the node with --debug.tip 0x5687e39ac00bce6dc1c713afb66ecbce9dbd04fc49bffb0cc87d7594da378ea5 (block 133089159. The node runs and does its thing until it encounters an error with one of the block hashes.

025-03-12T13:10:10.182152Z ERROR Stage encountered a validation error: receipt root mismatch: got 0xcc9ffc6900c53906a15631f3fa81198a02ecabfba68ce9f0a6947a92d0499bb0, expected 0x637d9e6847368bb52b56e90dd608facc34122c153872e8733cb0b01caa581f85 stage=Execution bad_block=105235064
2025-03-12T13:10:10.185685Z  INFO Unwinding{stage=Finish}: Starting unwind from=105235062 to=105235062 bad_block=Some(105235064)

The hash for block 105 235 064 (one block after bedrock) does not match and it begins to unwind.

Does anyone have any help on how we might be able to get this to work? Is this process even possible? Or is there a better way of getting the data? We have tried a public archive snapshot over on https://www.publicnode.com/snapshots, but that snapshot does only contain data until bedrock.

GETH allows redirection of pre-bedrock requests to legacy archives, which we have not found any hint on whether that's possible with op-reth.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you!