You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you're selling programs built and compiled with Bun, a major concern is preventing your code from being reverse-engineered. While Bun compiles to a native executable, it's not immune to skilled attackers who might try to reconstruct your source code or understand your proprietary logic. We need to discuss strategies like code obfuscation before compilation, adding anti-tampering measures directly into the binary, and exploring native code protections to make it significantly harder for others to steal or modify your intellectual property. What are your thoughts and experiences on securing compiled Bun applications against reverse engineering?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
If you're selling programs built and compiled with Bun, a major concern is preventing your code from being reverse-engineered. While Bun compiles to a native executable, it's not immune to skilled attackers who might try to reconstruct your source code or understand your proprietary logic. We need to discuss strategies like code obfuscation before compilation, adding anti-tampering measures directly into the binary, and exploring native code protections to make it significantly harder for others to steal or modify your intellectual property. What are your thoughts and experiences on securing compiled Bun applications against reverse engineering?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions