Skip to content

Conversation

@IvanNardi
Copy link
Collaborator

Even if it is only the proposed value by the client (and not the negotiated one), it might be use as hint for timeout by the (external) flows manager

@IvanNardi IvanNardi force-pushed the quic-idle-timeout branch 3 times, most recently from 6f73e05 to d22e752 Compare December 19, 2024 13:26
Even if it is only the proposed value by the client (and not the
negotiated one), it might be use as hint for timeout by the (external)
flows manager
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Collaborator

@utoni utoni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting. Did not know about ICSL.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-00 gave me some context

@utoni utoni merged commit 2e20f67 into ntop:dev Jan 6, 2025
34 checks passed
@IvanNardi IvanNardi deleted the quic-idle-timeout branch January 6, 2025 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants