binder: fix OOB in binder_add_freeze_work()

In binder_add_freeze_work() we iterate over the proc->nodes with the
proc->inner_lock held. However, this lock is temporarily dropped to
acquire the node->lock first (lock nesting order). This can race with
binder_deferred_release() which removes the nodes from the proc->nodes
rbtree and adds them into binder_dead_nodes list. This leads to a broken
iteration in binder_add_freeze_work() as rb_next() will use data from
binder_dead_nodes, triggering an out-of-bounds access:

  ==================================================================
  BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in rb_next+0xfc/0x124
  Read of size 8 at addr ffffcb84285f7170 by task freeze/660

  CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 660 Comm: freeze Not tainted 6.11.0-07343-ga727812a8d45 kernel-patches#18
  Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
  Call trace:
   rb_next+0xfc/0x124
   binder_add_freeze_work+0x344/0x534
   binder_ioctl+0x1e70/0x25ac
   __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x124/0x190

  The buggy address belongs to the variable:
   binder_dead_nodes+0x10/0x40
  [...]
  ==================================================================

This is possible because proc->nodes (rbtree) and binder_dead_nodes
(list) share entries in binder_node through a union:

	struct binder_node {
	[...]
		union {
			struct rb_node rb_node;
			struct hlist_node dead_node;
		};

Fix the race by checking that the proc is still alive. If not, simply
break out of the iteration.

Fixes: d579b04 ("binder: frozen notification")
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Todd Kjos <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Author: Carlos Llamas

drivers/android/binder.c

@@ -5593,6 +5593,8 @@ static void binder_add_freeze_work(struct binder_proc *proc, bool is_frozen)
 		prev = node;
 		binder_node_unlock(node);
 		binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
+		if (proc->is_dead)
+			break;
 	}
 	binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
 	if (prev)