Make TextCaseStartReplacingCommand more flexible #138
                  
                    
                      peterfication
                    
                  
                
                  started this conversation in
                Ideas
              
            Replies: 3 comments
-
| 
         In the end, PR #137 implemented both cases.  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            -
| 
         Dot repeatability. Just thinking in edge cases. I don't think it should support dot repeating. Curious what you find in your workflow  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            -
| 
         I think it can be "too big" to be dot repeatable. Normally, I such cases I use it and do adjustments to the file. Then I might make similar changes to another file. But it's ok to write it out again or go back in command history I'd say.  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Right now it only considers the full current word. It would be nice if it would use the part where the cursor is on.
CarListwith the cursor onCarit would openSubs/Car/EnhancedCarListwith the cursor onCarit would also openSubs/Car/Issue #135 with PR #137 tackles the first case. The second case is more complex to implement.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions