The specification of which terms to linearise is messy #269
Closed
tommbendall
started this conversation in
Design discussion
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This is handled much more neatly following #317 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently the terms to be linearised in an equation are specified through a dictionary, pairing term labels and fields. e.g.
Would it be better to replace
terms_to_linearisewith aterm_filterthat gets used by alabel_map? How do we easily make this configurable?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions