ruff linter --format=toml

[cleder]

This should produce an output:

[
"F", #  Pyflakes
"E", # pycodestyle Error
"W", # pycodestyle Warning
"C90", #  mccabe
"I", #  isort
"N", #  pep8-naming
"D", #  pydocstyle
"UP", #  pyupgrade
"YTT", #  flake8-2020
"ANN", #  flake8-annotations
"ASYNC", #  flake8-async
"S", #  flake8-bandit
"BLE", #  flake8-blind-except
"FBT", #  flake8-boolean-trap
"B", #  flake8-bugbear
"A", #  flake8-builtins
"COM", #  flake8-commas
"CPY", #  flake8-copyright
"C4", #  flake8-comprehensions
"DTZ", #  flake8-datetimez
"T10", #  flake8-debugger
"DJ", #  flake8-django
"EM", #  flake8-errmsg
"EXE", #  flake8-executable
"FA", #  flake8-future-annotations
"ISC", #  flake8-implicit-str-concat
"ICN", #  flake8-import-conventions
"G", #  flake8-logging-format
"INP", #  flake8-no-pep420
"PIE", #  flake8-pie
"T20", #  flake8-print
"PYI", #  flake8-pyi
"PT", #  flake8-pytest-style
"Q", #  flake8-quotes
"RSE", #  flake8-raise
"RET", #  flake8-return
"SLF", #  flake8-self
"SLOT", #  flake8-slots
"SIM", #  flake8-simplify
"TID", #  flake8-tidy-imports
"TCH", #  flake8-type-checking
"INT", #  flake8-gettext
"ARG", #  flake8-unused-arguments
"PTH", #  flake8-use-pathlib
"TD", #  flake8-todos
"FIX", #  flake8-fixme
"ERA", #  eradicate
"PD", #  pandas-vet
"PGH", #  pygrep-hooks
"PL", #  Pylint
"TRY", #  tryceratops
"FLY", #  flynt
"NPY", #  NumPy-specific rules
"AIR", #  Airflow
"PERF", #  Perflint
"FURB", #  refurb
"LOG", #  flake8-logging
"RUF", #  Ruff-specific rules
]

Rationale: When you have strict linting rules already enforced via flake8 + plugins it is a lot of cut and paste into the select , the output of this command can be directly pasted into the pyproject.toml.

In the interim I use a python script to produce this output (if somebody else has this need):

import json


def print_rule(item: str, category=""):
    print(
        f"\"{item['prefix']}\",",
        "#",
        category,
        item["name"],
    )


with open("ruff-linter.json") as f:
    data = json.load(f)


print("[")
for rule in data:
    if rule["prefix"]:
        print_rule(rule, "")
    else:
        for subrule in rule["categories"]:
            print_rule(subrule, rule["name"])
print("]")

[zanieb]

This is a nice idea, but we intend to re-categorize all of the rules into a much smaller sensible set of collections instead of using linter names. I think that'd replace the need for this.