Skip to content

Conversation

@phrwlk
Copy link

@phrwlk phrwlk commented Nov 8, 2025

Add NatSpec in ERC7913P256Verifier.sol to explicitly state the required key format for P256 ERC‑7913 verifiers: 64‑byte concatenation qx || qy, each 32‑byte big‑endian. Clarifies that SEC1 prefixes are not accepted and compressed keys are not supported.
Purpose: eliminate ambiguity for integrators; align with code behavior (key.length == 0x40 and bytes32 slicing) and sibling ERC7913WebAuthnVerifier documentation; prevent misuse with SEC1/uncompressed/compressed encodings.

@phrwlk phrwlk requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2025 15:03
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 8, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 978332c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation was added to the header comment of the ERC7913P256Verifier.sol file to specify the key format requirements. The documentation clarifies that keys must be 64-byte concatenations of P256 coordinates qx and qy, with each coordinate formatted as 32-byte big-endian values. The documentation also notes that SEC1 prefixes and compressed keys are not supported. No code or logic modifications were made to the verification functionality.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: document P256 ERC-7913 key format' clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding documentation about the P256 key format requirement for ERC-7913 verifiers.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the purpose of adding NatSpec documentation about the P256 key format requirements, existing code behavior alignment, and preventing misuse.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb97fd3 and 978332c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • contracts/utils/cryptography/verifiers/ERC7913P256Verifier.sol (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: tests-foundry
  • GitHub Check: slither
  • GitHub Check: halmos
  • GitHub Check: coverage
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: tests-upgradeable
🔇 Additional comments (1)
contracts/utils/cryptography/verifiers/ERC7913P256Verifier.sol (1)

12-15: Documentation accurately reflects code behavior and requirements.

The NatSpec documentation correctly specifies the P-256 key format requirements:

  • The 64-byte length requirement aligns with the key.length == 0x40 check on line 23
  • The coordinate extraction as 32-byte big-endian values matches the bytes32 slicing on lines 24-25
  • The restrictions on SEC1 prefixes and compressed keys are inherent to the strict 64-byte length requirement

The documentation is clear, concise, and sufficiently explicit about what formats are not accepted. This will help prevent misuse and misunderstandings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Amxx Amxx changed the base branch from master to typo-fixes November 10, 2025 09:48
@Amxx Amxx added documentation Inline comments, guides, and examples. ignore-changeset labels Nov 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Inline comments, guides, and examples. ignore-changeset

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants