You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’m interested in how these principles are best applied when working in Autodesk tools such as Fusion or Inventor. For example, when designing mechanical parts in Autodesk software, which features or workflows do you rely on most to account for things like load paths, stress concentration, tolerances, and manufacturability?
Do you follow these principles during the initial modelling stage, or do you mainly validate them later using simulation and analysis tools within Autodesk?
I’d appreciate hearing how experienced users translate fundamental mechanical design theory into practical Autodesk workflows.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’m reviewing some core mechanical design principles and came across this article that explains them very clearly:
https://www.justway.com/blog/Engineering_Technical/The_Design_Principles_of_Mechanical_Parts_a71968a1.html
I’m interested in how these principles are best applied when working in Autodesk tools such as Fusion or Inventor. For example, when designing mechanical parts in Autodesk software, which features or workflows do you rely on most to account for things like load paths, stress concentration, tolerances, and manufacturability?
Do you follow these principles during the initial modelling stage, or do you mainly validate them later using simulation and analysis tools within Autodesk?
I’d appreciate hearing how experienced users translate fundamental mechanical design theory into practical Autodesk workflows.
Thanks in advance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions